Evidence Hub

Dietary inflammatory index and unfavorable dietary patterns associated with ischemic stroke in China

Yu J, Chen W, Xiao G, An Q, Li Z, Liang B, Li Y, Zhao D et al.

Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2026

325 participants

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fish oil-enriched food for special medical purposes (FSMP, ProSure) compared to an oncology-specific enteral nutrition product (TPF-T).

Methods and study design: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority phase III trial (NCT05301556) included patients with gastrointestinal tumors scheduled for surgery and at high risk for malnutrition. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either FSMP or TPF-T as a sole nutritional source from 4±2 days before surgery to 9±3 days postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the change in serum pre-albumin levels from baseline to 9±3 days post-surgery (non-inferiority margin: 20.807 mg/L).

Results: Of the 325 patients randomized (FSMP: n = 162; TPF-T: n = 163), FSMP demonstrated non-inferiority to TPF-T in maintaining serum pre-albumin levels in the perioperative patients (least square [LS] mean differ-ence: 6.9 mg/L, 95% CI: -5.0 to 18.8). FSMP showed a greater reduction in serum triglycerides (LS mean difference: -0.133 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.239 to -0.027, p = 0.014), while comparable changes in other lipid parameters, serum albumin, body weight, or grip strength from baseline to 9±3 days post-surgery, and the length of hospital stay were observed between groups (all p >0.05). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders, including abdominal distension (FSMP: 17.3% vs. TPF-T: 18.4%), di-arrhea (21.0% vs.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 325 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free