Evidence Hub

A Bayesian analysis of the VITAL trial: effects of ω-3 fatty acid supplementation on cardiovascular events

Hamaya R, Cook NR, Sesso HD, Buring JE, Manson JE

The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background: Effects of ω-3 fatty acids (FAs) supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes have been investigated in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) is the largest trial that tested the effect of ω-3 FA supplementation (840 mg/d of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid in 1.2:1) in a primary prevention population in the United States, with nonsignificant results (P > 0.05) for major cardiovascular disease (CVD) events.

Objectives: To reanalyze VITAL using Bayesian methods accounting for prior evidence.

Methods: The VITAL randomly assigned 25,871 older United States adults with a median follow-up of 5.3 y. On the basis of prior evidence from RCTs, we used Weibull proportional hazards models adopting the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling method to estimate posterior hazard ratio (HR) for total CAD, myocardial infarction (MI), composite major CVD events (CAD/stroke/CVD death), CVD death, all-cause death, and stroke. Several distinct informative priors were formulated based on Bayesian hierarchical models of previous trials similar to VITAL.

Results: Bayesian analyses with the use of noninformative prior yielded essentially the same results as the corresponding frequentist analyses. The effects of ω-3 FA supplementation on CAD and MI were robust across the priors, with the posterior HR estimates varying from 0.88 to 0.93 and 0.82 to 0.90, respectively. Without skepticism into the priors, posterior HRs were 0.95-0.96 in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free