Evidence Hub

CAR T-cell Kinetics, Persistence, and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-cell ALL Treated with Obecabtagene Autoleucel in the FELIX Study

Roddie C, Day W, Raymond M, Cluxton D, Caulfield J, Dainton-Smith H, McElwee B, Hu Y et al.

Cancer research communications, 2026

Abstract

Assessments of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell pharmacokinetics by flow cytometry (FC) and a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay were compared in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) following treatment with obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel) in the phase Ib/II FELIX study (NCT04404660). CAR T-cell persistence and B-cell aplasia (BCA) were then correlated with event-free survival (EFS). Peripheral blood (PB) samples collected from 127 obe-cel-infused patients were tested by FC and ddPCR. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to measure the correlation between the number of CAR T-positive cells by FC and ddPCR. The impact of CAR T-cell persistence and BCA (B cells <20 cells/μL by FC in PB) on EFS was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. ddPCR was observed to statistically correlate with both the surface (0.60, P < 0.0001) and intracellular FC assays (0.74, P < 0.0001). A higher sensitivity for detecting CAR T-cell positive samples was observed with ddPCR, with 58.8% and 41.3% of samples negative by surface and intracellular FC, respectively, being positive by ddPCR. Loss of CAR T-cell persistence (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.4) and, to a lesser degree, B-cell recovery (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.7-3.8) as time-dependent variables and at month 3 were associated with poorer EFS. ddPCR demonstrated enhanced sensitivity over FC methods for detection of obe-cel persistence. Additionally, ongoing persistence and BCA…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free