Evidence Hub

Health-related quality of life analysis of the LEAP-002 study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Finn RS, Kudo M, Merle P, Meyer T, Qin S, Ikeda M, Xu R, Edeline J et al.

ESMO open, 2025

779 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a substantial symptom burden that affects their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Assessing the impact of first-line regimens on HRQoL is essential to evaluate clinical benefit in addition to efficacy and safety in this setting.

Methods: LEAP-002 is a randomized phase III trial of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib plus placebo as first-line treatment for participants with advanced HCC. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were prespecified exploratory endpoints assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18-item module (EORTC QLQ-HCC18), and EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline and throughout the trial. Median time to confirmed deterioration (TTD) in PROs was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Least-squares mean change from baseline to week 27 (latest time point when completion and compliance rates were ≥60% and ≥80%, respectively) in PRO scores was assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model. No formal hypotheses were tested.

Results: The PRO population comprised 779 participants (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, n = 390; lenvatinib plus placebo, n = 389). Completion rates for all PRO assessments were >94% at baseline and >63% at week 27. Median TTD for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 779 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free