Evidence Hub

A Prospective Cohort Study on the Usage, Safety, and Efficacy of Delamanid in Patients With Pulmonary Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Korea

Mok J, Seo H, Cho Y, Lee T, Kim SH, Park HK, Oh JY, Shim TS

Open forum infectious diseases, 2025

147 participants

Abstract

Background: Delamanid has demonstrated potential in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB); however, real-world data on its effectiveness and safety remain limited.

Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with pulmonary MDR-TB who were treated with a delamanid-containing longer regimen under programmatic conditions in South Korea between 2017 and 2021. Data on delamanid usage, safety, and efficacy were analyzed separately.

Results: In total, 147 patients were included in the usage and safety analyses (mean age, 50.7 years; 60.5% male). Adherence to delamanid was high, with a median adherence of 100.0%; 98.6% (n = 145) of the patients received more than 80% of the prescribed dose. Delamanid-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 44.2% (n = 65) of patients, with the most common AEs being nausea (10.9%), pruritus (6.8%), and QT interval prolongation (6.1%). Serious delamanid-related AEs were reported in 4.1% (n = 6) of the patients, and QTcF intervals exceeding 500 ms were observed in 6.8% (n = 10) during treatment. For the efficacy analysis, 105 and 122 patients were included in the treatment response (at the end of delamanid treatment) and treatment outcome (at the end of MDR-TB treatment) evaluations, respectively. Among those who were culture-positive at baseline, 92.0% achieved sputum culture conversion during delamanid treatment. The overall treatment success rate was 86.9%.

Conclusions: Delamanid…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 147 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free