Evidence Hub

The Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Extension Study – A Randomized Clinical Trial of Withdrawal of Supplementation with Omega-3 Fatty Acid in Patients with Dry Eye Disease

M. Hussain, R. Shtein, Maxwell Pistilli, M. Maguire, Marko Oydanich, P. Asbell

The ocular surface, 2019

22 participants · 47 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To determine effects of continued or discontinued use of omega-3 (ω3) fatty acid supplements through a randomized withdrawal trial among patients assigned to ω3 supplements in the first year of the DREAM study. Methods: Patients who were initially assigned to ω3 (3000 mg) for 12 months in the primary trial were randomized 1:1 to ω3 active supplements or placebos (refined olive oil) for 12 more months. The primary outcome was change in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score. Secondary outcomes included change in conjunctival staining, corneal staining, tear break-up time, Schirmer test, and adverse events. Results: Among 22 patients assigned to ω3 and 21 to placebo supplements, the mean change in OSDI score between month 12 and 24 was similar between treatment groups (mean difference in change −0.6 points, 95% confidence interval [CI], (−10.7, 9.5), p= 0.91). There were no significant differences between groups in mean change in conjunctival staining (difference in mean change −0.5 points; 95% CI (−1.2, 0.3)), corneal staining (−0.3 points; 95% CI (−1.2, 0.3)), tear break-up time (−0.8 seconds; 95% CI (−2.6, 0.9)) and Schirmer test (0.6 mm, 95% CI (−2.0, 3.2)). Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Among patients who received ω3 supplements for 12 months in the primary trial, those discontinuing use of ω3 for an additional 12 months did not have significantly worse outcomes compared to those who continued use of ω3.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free