Evidence Hub

Differential cardiovascular impact of ω-3 fatty acid in patients at high cardiovascular risk in Asians versus non-Asians: Sub-analysis of the strength randomized clinical trial

Wang TKM, Nicholls SJ, St John J, Wolski K, Nissen SE

Atherosclerosis, 2025

11,723 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Racial differences in lipid and cardiovascular risk profiles are well-established, including for Asians. We compared cardiovascular treatment effects of ω-3 carboxylic acid (CA) between Asians and non-Asians in this post-hoc analysis of the STRENGTH trial.

METHODS: The STRENGTH trial was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 13,078 high cardiovascular risk patients enrolled at 675 global centers. Efficacy and interactions of ω-3 CA for Asians (n = 1355) and non-Asians (n = 11,723) were assessed. The primary endpoint is a 5-point composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, and unstable angina hospitalizations.

RESULTS: In Asians, ω-3 CA was associated with significantly reduction in the primary endpoint during 3.6 ± 0.7 years follow-up with 81/698 (Kaplan-Meier estimate (KME): 14.8 %) events in the ω-3 CA group, 103/657 (KME: 20.4 %) events in the corn oil group, hazard ratio (HR) 0.72, 95 %CI 0.54-0.96, p = 0.03. In non-Asians, there was not a significant difference in primary endpoint rates, 704/5841 (KME: 15.6 %) events in the ω-3 CA group, 692/5882 (KME: 15.9 %) events in the corn oil group, HR 1.03 95 %CI 0.93-1.14, p = 0.60. There were significant interactions between race (Asian vs non-Asian) and treatment group for the primary endpoint (p = 0.02) and non-fatal stroke (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION: In this exploratory analysis from the neutral STRENGTH trial, ω-3 CA was associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 11,723 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free