Evidence Hub

Novel risk model for predicting incident atrial fibrillation in patients taking ω-3 fatty acid: sub-analysis of the STRENGTH randomized trial

Wang TKM, Nicholls SJ, Tan C, Liao BY, Wolski K, St John J, Nissen SE

American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026

13,078 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fish oils are associated with higher risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in randomized trials, risk factors for this remain unknown. We analyzed associated factors and developed a novel risk score for predicting AF in patients at elevated cardiovascular risk in this secondary analysis of the STRENGTH trial.

METHODS: The STRENGTH trial randomized 13,078 patients at high cardiovascular risk at 1:1 ratio to receive either ω-3 carboxylic acid (CA) or corn oil placebo at 675 centers during 10/30/2014-6/14/2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to develop a risk score to help identify new AF during follow-up in the ω-3 CA group without prior history of AF.

RESULTS: Amongst 6000 ω-3 CA group and 6012 placebo group patients without history of AF, 126 (2.1 %) and 75 (1.2 %) developed AF, respectively, during mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 0.8 years. In the ω-3 CA arm, older age, males, higher body mass index, history of heart failure, diabetes on insulin, and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were independently associated with incident AF during follow-up. A novel risk score based on these six parameters predicted incident AF with c-index 0.72 in the ω-3 CA group, and 0.73 when applied to the placebo group.

CONCLUSION: A novel risk score for predicting AF development in patients at elevated cardiovascular risk receiving ω-3 CA had moderate discriminative ability in both patients receiving ω-3 CA and placebo. Further research is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 13,078 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free