Evidence Hub

Can prenatal conditions impact the effect of omega-3 on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Rais H, Pronovost E, Guillot M, Boutin A, Simonyan D, Mohamed I, Lavoie PM, Piedboeuf B et al.

European journal of pediatrics, 2025

271 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To explore whether prenatal conditions (i.e. chorioamnionitis, preeclampsia or small-for-gestational age (SGA)) affect the very preterm infant's response to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), according to mode of delivery, an independent factor shown to modulate this association. Secondary exploratory analysis of the MOBYDIck randomized controlled trial (NCT02371460) evaluating the effect of a neonatal high-dose DHA supplementation through maternal breastmilk compared to placebo. Population was preterm infants born before 29 weeks of gestation in sixteen Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Primary outcome was physiological BPD based on pulse oximetry assessment. Secondary outcomes included "death or BPD"; "moderate-or-severe" BPD; severe BPD; death from any causes. Heterogeneity in the effect of DHA on outcomes was assessed by prenatal conditions and mode of delivery using generalized estimating equation logistic regression models. The trial intended to enroll 800 mothers but was stopped early for safety, likely making subgroup analysis underpowered. 230 mothers (271 infants) were included in DHA group and 226 mothers (252 infants) in placebo group. The association between high-dose DHA and BPD differed by chorioamnionitis status (heterogeneity P=0.04). In infants exposed to chorioamnionitis and vaginal delivery, DHA supplementation was associated with a reduced risk of physiological BPD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.05 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 271 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free