Evidence Hub

ω-3 Ethyl ester results in better cognitive function at 12 and 30 months than control in cognitively healthy subjects with coronary artery disease: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Malik A, Ramadan A, Vemuri B, Siddiq W, Amangurbanova M, Ali A, Welty FK

The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021

285 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids have shown benefit in cognitively impaired subjects, but the effect on cognitively healthy older subjects is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to determine if long-term, high-dose ω-3 ethyl esters, EPA (20:5n-3) and DHA (22:6n-3), prevent deterioration of cognitive function in cognitively healthy older adults.

METHODS

A total of 285 subjects with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) on statin treatment were randomly assigned to 3.36 g EPA and DHA or none (control) for 30 mo. Cognitive function was assessed in all 285 subjects at baseline and in 268 and 250 subjects who returned at 12- and 30-mo follow-up, respectively, with neuropsychological testing as a prespecified secondary outcome. A completer's analysis, along with a sensitivity analysis carrying forward the last observation, was performed.

RESULTS

Over the 30-mo period, subjects randomly assigned to EPA and DHA had significantly better scores than control for verbal fluency, language, and memory (mean: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.25, 1.91; P = 0.011) and 2 tests of visual-motor coordination (mean: -2.95; 95% CI: -5.33, -0.57; P = 0.015 and mean: -9.44; 95% CI: -18.60, -0.30; P = 0.043, respectively). The better scores for EPA and DHA were due to an improvement at 12 mo compared with baseline in verbal fluency, language, and memory (P = 0.047) and 2 tests of visual-motor coordination (P = 0.033 and P < 0.001, respectively), whereas control had no change. Post hoc analyses indicated no difference…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 285 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free