Evidence Hub

Impact of rs174537 on Critically Ill Patients with Acute Lung Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the OMEGA Randomized Clinical Trial

Dosso B, Waits CMK, Simms KN, Sergeant S, Files DC, Howard TD, Langefeld CD, Chilton FH et al.

Current developments in nutrition, 2020

129 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nutrition in the intensive care unit is vital for patient care; however, immunomodulatory diets rich in PUFAs like γ-linolenic acid (GLA), EPA, and DHA remain controversial for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We postulate that genetic variants impacting PUFA metabolism contribute to mixed responses to PUFA-rich diets.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to test the effects of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs174537 on differential responses to PUFA-rich diets.

METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the OMEGA trial (NCT00609180) where 129 subjects received placebo control diets and 143 received omega-oil. DNA was extracted from buffy coats and used to genotype rs174537; plasma was used to quantitate PUFAs. We tested for SNP-diet interactions on PUFA concentrations, inflammatory biomarkers, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS: We observed that all individuals receiving omega-oil displayed significantly higher concentrations of GLA, EPA, and DHA (all P < 0.0001), but they did not vary by genotype at rs174537. Statistically significant SNP-diet interactions were observed on circulating DHA concentrations in African Americans. Specifically, African American T-allele carriers on placebo illustrated elevated DHA concentrations. Additionally, all individuals receiving omega-oil had higher concentrations of EPA-derived urinary F3-isoprostane (Caucasians: P = 0.0011; African Americans: P = 0.0002). Despite these findings, we did not detect any…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 129 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free