Evidence Hub

Effects of different beverages on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fang J, Huang F, Gu Q, Meng J, Zou H, Han Y, Han Y, Liu H et al.

2026

1,368 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background The role of specific beverages as adjunctive strategies for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of different beverage interventions—including tea, wine, water, and other beverages—on glycemic control in patients with T2DM. Methods A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted up to April 27, 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing beverage-based interventions in patients with T2DM were included. The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Hedges‘ g with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results Twenty-three RCTs comprising 1,368 participants were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that beverage interventions significantly reduced HbA1c compared with controls (Hedges’ g = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.16; P

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,368 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free