Evidence Hub

Perioperative high-dose selenium supplementation in open thoracic aortic surgery: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the SUSTAIN CSX trial

Catena D, Stoppe C, Mohsen G, Germinario L, Kleine-Brueggeney M, O'Brien B, Ott S, Hagen XA et al.

Journal of thoracic disease, 2026

287 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Open surgery on the thoracic aorta is associated with a variable and often pronounced postoperative inflammatory response, which contributes to organ injury and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Various anti-inflammatory strategies have been proposed as a way to modulate this response and therefore improve clinical outcomes. The SUSTAIN-CSX randomized controlled trial investigated the effect of perioperative high-dose selenium supplementation on mortality and organ dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients. In this post hoc analysis, we examined its effect on 30-day mortality and organ dysfunction in patients undergoing open thoracic aortic surgery.

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of patients who underwent open thoracic aortic surgery within the SUSTAIN-CSX trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating perioperative intravenous high-dose selenium supplementation in cardiac surgery. The selenium regimen consisted of 2,000 µg sodium selenite at anesthesia induction, 2,000 µg immediately postoperatively, and 1,000 µg daily for up to 10 days in the ICU. Patients treated with endovascular interventions of the thoracic aorta were excluded.

Results: A total of 287 patients were included, with 144 randomized to selenium and 143 to placebo. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, did not differ significantly between groups (selenium 2.8% vs. placebo 3.5%; P=0.73). Clinically relevant postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurred more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 287 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free