Evidence Hub

Association Between Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Incidence in Non-Hispanic White and Black Women: Methodological Considerations From a Secondary Analysis of the Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial Cohort

Oluwole OE, Jacobs DR, Aremu TO

Cureus, 2026

11,377 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity and age are established risk factors for breast cancer, but racial differences in the association between body mass index (BMI) and breast cancer incidence remain incompletely understood. This study examined the association between BMI and breast cancer incidence among non-Hispanic White and Black women in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) cohort and secondarily considered methodological issues that may arise when clinical trial data are analyzed observationally.

Methods: We conducted a secondary observational analysis of women enrolled in the VITAL cohort, treating trial participants as a cohort rather than comparing randomized treatment arms. After excluding men and women of races/ethnicities other than non-Hispanic White or Black, 11,377 women aged 55-90 years at baseline with no previous history of breast cancer were included. Using SAS OnDemand software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), we examined the association between BMI and the incidence of breast cancer with Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results: The study sample of 218 women with breast cancer included 84% non-Hispanic White women (n = 183) and 16% Black women (n = 35). Age and White race were each positively related to incident breast cancer in unadjusted models (both p 2 = 7.23). On more detailed examination, the increasing breast cancer risk was found mainly across lower levels of BMI and younger ages in these non-Hispanic White and Black women.

Conclusion: Breast cancer…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11,377 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free