Evidence Hub

Association between non-adherence to fish oil or placebo as a risk factor of transition to psychosis in ultra-high-risk individuals in the NEURAPRO study

Schlögelhofer M, Lin A, Markulev C, Schäfer MR, McGorry PD, Nelson B, Street R, Mossaheb N et al.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2025

304 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objective: Non-adherence is an important factor in clinical trials, which has not been investigated in people at ultra-high risk (UHR) of developing a first episode of psychosis.

Methods: Exploratory analysis of data from NEURAPRO, a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 PUFAs) in 304 individuals at UHR. We examined correlates of non-adherence with study medication (omega-3 PUFAs or placebo), including patient, illness and treatment factors, plus transition to psychosis. Non-adherence was defined as <75% study medication intake over 6 months and, post hoc, by the number of returned pills.

Results: Of 285 randomized participants with baseline fatty acid data, 163 (57.2%) were non-adherent. In univariate analyses, non-adherence was associated with baseline omega-3 index, pre-baseline duration of untreated symptoms, smoking, cannabis use, lower baseline Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, Global Functioning: Social and Role Scale scores and transition to psychosis. Transition to psychosis risk was significantly lower in the adherent than non-adherent group (4.2%, 95% CI = 0.7-7.7% vs 17.3%, 95% CI = 10.4-24.2%), Kaplan-Meier Log-rank test, chi-square = 10.675, p = 0.001), independent of omega-3 PUFA treatment status. Similarly, Cox regression analysis, covarying for the aforementioned factors significantly associated with non-adherence, also revealed non-adherence as an independent predictor of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 304 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free