Evidence Hub

Urinary metabolites as a predictive marker for perinatal depression: A secondary analysis of the mothers, Omega-3 & Mental Health Study

P. Greco, A. Hesson, E. Mozurkewich, D. Berman

Psychiatry Research Communications, 2022

105 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Perinatal depression has been associated with unfavorable pregnancy and childhood development outcomes; however, no objective markers exist to identify perinatal mood disorders. We investigated whether metabolites in maternal urine during pregnancy can predict increased depressive symptoms in late pregnancy and postpartum among pregnant women at risk for perinatal depression. Methods: We evaluated metabolomic markers in urine collected at 12–20 and 34–36 weeks’ gestation. We analyzed 49 urinary metabolites using ion pairing reversed-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Depressive symptom severity was identified using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores from 105 participants at 12–20 and 34–36 weeks’ gestation, and 6–8 weeks’ postpartum. Mixed model repeated measures analysis evaluated associations between changes in maternal urinary metabolites and BDI scores across pregnancy. Results: Increases in urinary xanthine and hypoxanthine were positively associated with increases in maternal depressive symptoms throughout pregnancy (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). This finding did not persist after false discovery rate correction. None of the urinary metabolites examined were significantly associated with development of postpartum depressive symptoms. Limitations: This study is an exploratory secondary biologic sample analysis from a trial whose sample size was determined by a different primary outcome and expected effect size, which may have limited…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 105 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free