Evidence Hub

Changes in EPA and DHA during supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids and incident cardiovascular events: secondary analysis from the OMEMI trial

P. Myhre, E. B. Smith, A. Kalstad, S. Tveit, K. Laake, P. Smith, D. Nilsen, A. Tveit et al.

European Heart Journal, 2021

1,014 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

In the OMEMI trial, elderly post-MI patients did not achieve reduction in cardiovascular events from supplementation of 1.8g n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). In two recent trials of hypertriglyceridaemic patients the REDUCE-IT trial demonstrated an association between high levels of serum eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and reduced risk of CV events with 4 g/day icosapent ethyl supplements while in the STRENGTH trial no such association was present in patients treated with 4 g/day of EPA+ docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

To assess associations between changes in concentrations of EPA and DHA during two years supplementation with n-3 PUFA and incident cardiovascular events in the OMEMI trial.

In the randomized controlled OMEMI trial, 1014 elderly patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were treated with 1.8g/day of EPA and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or placebo for two years, and followed for the primary outcome of MACE (AMI, coronary revascularization, stroke or heart failure hospitalization) and secondary outcome of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). Serum concentrations of EPA and DHA were measured at inclusion and at study completion by gas chromatography, and reported as % weight of total FA (%wt) in serum phospholipids.

Serial EPA and DHA measurements at study inclusion and completion were available in 881 patients (92% of survivors). At baseline EPA and DHA concentrations were (mean±SD) 2.84±1.41 and 5.71±1.35%wt, respectively. Higher baseline EPA and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,014 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free