Evidence Hub

Abstract 13778: Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Revascularization and Major Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

F. Sofi, M. Dinu, S. Lotti, Luca Genovese, A. V. Mattioli, Giuseppe Ambrosio

Circulation, 2023

65,771 participants

Abstract

Background:

Benefits of omega-3 administration in preventing cardiovascular (CV) events are controversial. In particular, while statins have been associated with significant reduction of revascularizations (Revasc), effects of omega-3 on Revasc are unclear.

Aim:

To metanalyze evidence on the effect of omega-3 administration on incident Revasc and CV events (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, heart failure [HF], CV death).

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web-of-Science and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥500 participants comparing the effects of omega-3 formulations [decosahexanoic acid+eicosapentaenoic acid (DHA+EPA) or EPA alone] versus placebo.

Results:

Seventeen RCTs with participants (both primary and secondary CV prevention) randomized to DHA+EPA (n=52,498) or EPA alone (n=13,415) and controls (n=65,771) were included. Follow-up ranged from 4.5 months to 7.4 years. Significant heterogeneity emerged among studies (Figure). Overall, compared to controls omega-3 supplementation was associated with reduced risk of Revasc (Figure) and MI [0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.98; p

heter

=0.04; I

2

=45%; p=0.02] with no significant effect on stroke, HF, and CV death. Reduced risk of Revasc was still observed when most (≥60%) participants were already on statins (Figure). Compared to DHA+EPA, EPA alone was associated with a greater reduced risk of Revasc (Figure) and stroke [0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95], with no significant effect on HF and CV death. No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 65,771 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free