Evidence Hub

Intrinsic Frequencies of Carotid Pressure Waveforms Predict Heart Failure Events: The Framingham Heart Study

Cooper LL, Rong J, Pahlevan NM, Rinderknecht DG, Benjamin EJ, Hamburg NM, Vasan RS, Larson MG et al.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2021

4,700 participants

Abstract

Intrinsic frequencies (IFs) derived from arterial waveforms are associated with cardiovascular performance, aging, and prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, prognostic value of these novel measures is unknown. We hypothesized that IFs are associated with incident CVD risk. Our sample was drawn from the Framingham Heart Study Original, Offspring, and Third Generation Cohorts and included participants free of CVD at baseline (N=4700; mean age 52 years, 55% women). We extracted 2 dominant frequencies directly from a series of carotid pressure waves: the IF of the coupled heart and vascular system during systole (ω1) and the IF of the decoupled vasculature during diastole (ω2). Total frequency variation (Δω) was defined as the difference between ω1 and ω2. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to relate IFs to incident CVD events during a mean follow-up of 10.6 years. In multivariable models adjusted for CVD risk factors, higher ω1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 [95% CI], 1.03-1.26]; P=0.01) and Δω (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.03-1.30]; P=0.02) but lower ω2 (HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.99]; P=0.03) were associated with higher risk for incident composite CVD events. In similarly adjusted models, higher ω1 (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.07-1.42]; P=0.004) and Δω (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.05-1.50]; P=0.01) but lower ω2 (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66-0.99]; P=0.04) were associated with higher risk for incident heart failure. IFs were not significantly associated with incident myocardial infarction…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,700 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free