Evidence Hub

Comparative effectiveness of adding Omega-3 or Vitamin D to standard therapy in preventing and treating episodes of painful crisis in pediatric sickle cell patients

Abdelhalim SM, Murphy JE, Meabed MH, Elberry AA, Gamaleldin MM, Shaalan MS, Hussein RRS

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 2022

165 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sickle Cell Anemia (SCA), also called the Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), is an inherited hematological disorder characterized by a syndrome of acute anemia and a painful crisis. The sickling hemoglobin, Hgb-S causes viscosity and inflammation of blood vessels. Eventually, the red blood cells get eliminated from the circulation process, which leads to hemolytic anemia. This study examined the comparative effectiveness of supplementation of Omega-3 or vitamin-D to standard therapy (hydroxyurea + Ibuprofen) used for prevention and treatment of pain crises in pediatric patients living with SCD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 165 patients participated in this randomized, double-blind, standard therapy-controlled, parallel-design trial. The patients were randomly divided into three groups, receiving three capsules of either 1,000 mg Omega-3 fish oil (400 mg EPA and 300 mg DHA) or 1.5 mL vitamin-D (2,800 IU/7 ml) daily for 10 months plus the standard therapy. Lactate dehydrogenase, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), hematocrit, reticulocyte count, and white-blood-cell count were determined at baseline (month zero) and end of the 10th month. The pain severity was measured using the visual analog scale method (VAS). Therefore, a 10-cm ruler with a VAS design was used to determine the patient pain intensity. The baseline time point was defined as the time spot before starting to deliver the experimental medication to the patients (month zero). At that time,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 165 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free