Evidence Hub

Striatal DAT and extrastriatal SERT binding in early-stage Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, compared with healthy controls: An 123I-FP-CIT SPECT study

Joling M, Vriend C, Raijmakers PGHM, van der Zande JJ, Lemstra AW, Berendse HW, Booij J, van den Heuvel OA

NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019

16 participants

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are thought to be part of a spectrum: both have a clinical profile including symptoms associated with dopaminergic and serotonergic loss, yet few imaging studies have focused on serotonergic neurodegeneration in both disorders. We aimed to study degeneration of terminals with dopamine and serotonin transporter (DAT and SERT, respectively) in patients with early-stage PD and DLB relative to healthy controls, using 123I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane (123I-FP-CIT) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). We conducted region of interest (ROI) and voxel-based analyses on 123I-FP-CIT SPECT scans. Using the cerebellum as a reference region, we determined binding ratios (BRs) for bilateral ROIs in the DAT-rich striatum (head of the caudate nucleus and posterior putamen) and SERT-rich extrastriatal brain regions (thalamus, hypothalamus and hippocampus). We compared BRs in PD and DLB patients with BRs in healthy controls (all groups: n = 16). Both PD and DLB patients had lower striatal 123I-FP-CIT BRs than healthy controls for the bilateral caudate head (PD-left: F(1,29) = 28.778, P < .001, ω2 = 0.35; right: F(1,29) = 35.338, P < .001, ω2 = 0.42; DLB-left: F(1,29) = 28.241, P < .001, ω2 = 0.31; right: F(1,29) = 18.811, P < .001, ω2 = 0.26) and bilateral posterior putamen (PD-left: F(1,29) = 107.531, P < .001, ω2 = 0.77; right: F(1,29) = 87.525, P < .001, ω2 = 0.72; DLB-left: F(1,29)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free