Evidence Hub

Endocardial impedance mapping during circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation differentiates between atrial and venous tissue

Lang CC, Gugliotta F, Santinelli V, Mesas C, Tomita T, Vicedomini G, Augello G, Gulletta S et al.

Heart rhythm, 2006

79 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Accurate left atrial (LA) mapping is essential for creating lesions at the LA-pulmonary vein (PV) junction, avoiding PV stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish whether endocardial impedance varies within the LA and PVs and whether it is a useful tool for mapping and ablation.

METHODS: Pilot Phase: Three-dimensional LA maps were created using CARTO. Impedance (Z) was measured using a radiofrequency generator at multiple points in the LA, PV ostia (PVO), and deep PVs in 79 patients undergoing their first AF ablation (group 1) and 29 patients undergoing repeat CPVA (group 2). Prospective Phase: In an additional 20 patients, using pilot phase data, one operator defined catheter tip location as either LA or PVO based on CARTO and fluoroscopy. A second operator blinded to CARTO simultaneously did the same based on impedance at 15 +/- 4 points per patient.

RESULTS: Group 1: Z(LA) was 99.4 +/- 9.0 omega. Z(PVO) was higher (109.2 +/- 8.5 omega), rising further as the catheter advanced into deep PV (137 omega +/- 18). Z(PVO) differed from Z(LA) by 9 +/- 4 omega. Group 2 had a lower Z(LA) and Z(PVO) compared with group 1 (P <.05). Impedance monitoring differentiated between LA and PVO, with 91% specificity and sensitivity, 96% positive predictive value, and 81% negative predictive value. At 3-month follow-up, no patients had evidence of PV stenosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 79 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free