Evidence Hub

Methods and reproducibility of measurement of resistivity in the calf using regional bioimpedance analysis

Zhu F, Sarkar S, Kaitwatcharachai C, Greenwood R, Ronco C, Levin NW

Blood purification, 2003

10 participants

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The usefulness of regional bioimpedance analysis (RBIA) in determining the dry weight in dialysis patients is currently being investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of measurement of resistivity in the calf.

METHODS: Twenty-five normal subjects and 10 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis were studied. Four electrodes inserted into a blood pressure cuff were placed on the calf. Bioimpedance was continuously measured over 3- to 5-min periods (Xitron Hydra). After a resting period of 1 min, cuff pressure was increased to above the systolic blood pressure (SBP) for a few seconds to expel excess ECF fluid and then deflated. The effect on recordings of moving the electrodes 2 cm higher and then 2 cm lower than the normal position was studied in 8 normal subjects. In a second study of reproducibility, post-dialysis measurements were made twice in 10 patients who maintained the same post-dialysis target weight throughout the study period.

RESULTS: The mean resting resistivity rho(0) in normal subjects was 532.6 +/- 95 omega.cm rising to 583.9 +/- 99.7 omega.cm when cuff pressure was applied rho(p). The average values of rho(0) and rho(p) in patients post-dialysis were 489 +/- 74 and 537 +/- 77 respectively showing that there were no significant differences in rho(0) and rho(p) between normal subjects and patients post-dialysis. The mean values of change in resistivity when the electrodes were shifted between the lowest and highest…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free