Evidence Hub

Hypopharyngeal reconstruction using remnant narrow pharyngeal wall as omega-shaped radial forearm free flap

Hong JW, Jeong HS, Lew DH, Roh TS, Tark KC, Choi EC, Lee WJ

The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2009

35 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: There have been numerous attempts to use pharyngoesophageal reconstruction to restore swallowing function. Much controversy exist over reconstruction after total or partial pharyngectomy, and there is also debate over whether to continue with the reconstructive procedure with a narrow strip of remnant mucosa or complete it after total pharyngectomy. We analyzed the utility of omega-shaped radial forearm free flap (RFFF) using the narrow remnant posterior pharyngeal wall.

METHODS: Patients in group 1 (n = 12) had a narrow remnant pharyngeal wall with a width of less than 3 cm. Those in group 2 (n = 35) had a remnant pharynx with a width larger than 3 cm. The incidence of fistula, stricture, and swallowing difficulty were evaluated. Swallowing difficulty was graded using a 7-point visual analog scale. All circumferential hypopharyngeal reconstruction with tubed RFFF, pectoralis major flap, and jejunal free flap were also compared with group 1.

RESULTS: All flaps survived, and 1 fistula (8%) was detected in group 1. Compared with tubed RFFF (46%) and tubed pectoralis major flap (57%), this is a relatively low rate of fistula formation. In group 1, normal diet was possible in 92% of patients, but 1 patient can tolerate a liquid diet only. In group 2, normal diet was possible in 80% of patients. As for swallowing difficulty, the median visual analog scale score for both groups 1 and 2 was 6 points. When comparing different flaps, stricture and fistula rate was 0 and 8%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 35 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free