Evidence Hub

Risk factors associated with craniosynostosis: a case control study

Ardalan M, Rafati A, Nejat F, Farazmand B, Majed M, El Khashab M

Pediatric neurosurgery, 2012

70 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis is a relatively common congenital abnormality. The underlying etiology and most probable risk factors of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis are unknown. We conducted a study to identify the risk factors for craniosynostosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case-control project, 70 children with craniosynostosis (syndromic or nonsyndromic) hospitalized at the Children's Hospital Medical Center from September 2010 to 2011 were studied for the potential risk factors. At the same time, 70 age- and sex-matched children hospitalized with other congenital anomalies were reviewed. Information from case and control groups was obtained via personal interviews with parents of patients and a prepared checklist was filled out for each child.

RESULTS: The mean (±SE) age at admission time in the case-control group was 13 ± 1.95 (1.5-96) months, and almost half of them were boys (n = 37 or 53%). The most frequent sutures involved in craniosynostosis were coronal (n = 30 or 42.9%) and then metopic sutures (n = 16 or 22.9%), multiple (n = 12 or 17.1%), sagittal (n = 11 or 15.7%) and lambdoid (n = 1 or 1.4%). In the case group, maternal diabetes mellitus and thyroid disease were found in 8 (11.6%) and 6 (8.6%) patients, respectively. The most frequent medication used by mothers (n = 66 or 94%) in the case group during pregnancy were vitamins (including iron supplements, omega 3, folic acid and multivitamins).

CONCLUSION: A positive family history of craniosynostosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 70 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free