Evidence Hub

The ocular hemodynamic response to nitric oxide synthase inhibition is unaltered in patients with early type I diabetes

Dorner GT, Garhöfer G, Selenko N, Fasching P, Bayerle-Eder M, Schmetterer L, Wolzt M

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2003

10 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An impaired ocular hemodynamic response to systemic nitric oxide synthesis inhibition has been demonstrated in patients with long-standing insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. It is unclear whether this altered responsiveness is already detectable in early uncomplicated type I diabetes.

METHODS: The effect of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl- l-arginine (L-NMMA) was studied in 10 male patients with early type I diabetes under euglycemic conditions and 10 healthy matched control subjects in a single (analyst) blinded cohort study design. Changes in ocular hemodynamics (fundus pulsation amplitude, mean flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery) and in pulse rate and mean blood pressure were measured in response to systemic intravenous doses of 1.5, 3, and 6 mg/kg L-NMMA.

RESULTS: L-NMMA dose-dependently and significantly decreased fundus pulsation amplitude (-21.0% vs -23.3% in diabetics and controls, respectively), mean flow velocity in the ophthalmic artery (-12.3% vs -10.8%) and pulse rate (-15.4% vs -16.6%) and increased mean arterial pressure (+19.5% vs +14.7%). The ocular and systemic hemodynamic effects of L-NMMA were not different between patients with diabetes and controls.

CONCLUSION: The responsiveness of the choroidal vasculature and the ophthalmic artery to L-NMMA is not altered in early type 1 diabetes. An impaired hemodynamic response to nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in diabetes is therefore not caused by a primary defect but…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free