Evidence Hub

Vascular network changes in the retina with age and hypertension

Stanton AV, Wasan B, Cerutti A, Ford S, Marsh R, Sever PP, Thom SA, Hughes AD

Journal of hypertension, 1995

13 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare retinal arterial bifurcation geometry in normotensive and hypertensive subjects.

DESIGN: A retrospective observational study.

METHODS: Fluorescein angiograms of normotensive (n = 13) and hypertensive (n = 12) subjects aged 30-80 years with uni-ocular retinal pathology were compared. Quantification of diameters of the parent, larger daughter and smaller daughter vessels (d0, d1 and d2, respectively) and of bifurcation angles (the angle between the two daughter arterioles, omega) of arteriolar bifurcations was performed from digitized retinal angiograms of the uninvolved eye. The relative diameters of parent and daughter vessels at bifurcations were summarized by junction exponents (x) such that d1x + d2x = d0x.

RESULTS: Junction exponents were similar for normotensives and hypertensives (means +/- SEM, 2.65 +/- 0.18 and 2.48 +/- 0.17), but analysis of covariance showed a parallel decrease in x in the two groups with age. A positive association was found between x and arteriolar microvascular density. Bifurcation angles were more acute in hypertensives (74 +/- 3 degrees) than in normotensives (84 +/- 3 degrees) and declined with increasing age in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that ageing and possibly hypertension are associated with disadvantageous branching geometry in the human retinal vasculature, implying increased power costs of blood transport, uneven distribution of shear forces throughout the vascular tree and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free