Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis

Shah A, Zehra Rizvi SV, Nawaz J, Saif H, Rizvi SUA, Rathi D, Fatima S, Khan S et al.

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026

1,161 participants

Abstract

Background: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant/difficult-to-treat (MDR/DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa present a significant challenge for treatment. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A) are important options that combine β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors, but their effectiveness compared to each other is still unclear.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, evaluated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), of comparative observational studies that included hospitalized adults with confirmed MDR/DTR P. aeruginosa infections up to 10 October 2025 (English only). Studies comparing C/T directly with C/A and matched therapies were included. We used random-effects Mantel-Haenszel models to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and we assessed heterogeneity with I 2. We reviewed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Results: Six observational cohorts (n = 1161) met our criteria. There were no significant differences between C/T and C/A for clinical success (RR: 1.07, 0.89-1.29; I 2 = 40%), 30-day all-cause mortality (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83-1.27; I 2 = 0%), 30-day recurrence (RR: 0.85, 0.46-1.57; I 2 = 48%), 90-day recurrence (RR: 0.80, 0.63-1.02; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.08), emergence of resistance (RR: 0.73, 0.30-1.81; I 2 = 84%), and microbiological response failure (RR: 0.91, 0.66-1.26; I 2 = 8%). There was a non-significant trend that slightly favored C/T for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,161 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free