Evidence Hub

Altered Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentrations of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Compounds in Early Stages of Multiple Sclerosis-Metabolic Profile Analyses

Podlecka-Piętowska A, Kacka A, Zakrzewska-Pniewska B, Nojszewska M, Zieminska E, Chalimoniuk M, Toczylowska B

Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2019

19 participants

Abstract

The lack of a single predictive or diagnostic test in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a major obstacle in the patient's care. The aim of this study was to investigate metabolic profiles, especially lipids in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using 1H-NMR spectroscopy and metabolomics analysis to discriminate MS patient group from the control ones. In this study, 19 MS patients and 19 controls, without neurological problems, patients were enrolled. To obtain the CSF metabolic profiles, NMR spectroscopy was used. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds were analyzed using univariate and multivariate supervised analysis orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Targeted OPLS-DA analysis of 32 hydrophilic and 17 hydrophobic compounds obtained 9 hydrophilic metabolites and 8 lipid functional groups which had the highest contribution to patient's group separation. Lower concentrations of CSF hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds were observed in MS patients as compared to control group. Acetone, choline, urea, 1,3-dimethylurate, creatinine, isoleucine, myo-inositol, leucine, and 3-OH butyrate; saturated and monounsaturated acyl groups of ω-9, ω-7, ω-6, ω-3, and fatty acid, triglycerides, 1,3-DG, 1-MG, and unassigned component signal at 3.33 ppm were the most important signal compounds in group separation. Analysis of metabolic profile of raw CSF and their lipid extract shows decreased levels of many compounds and led to the conclusion that MS patients could have a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free