Evidence Hub

Management of Large Full-Thickness Burns Using Kerecis™ Acellular Fish Skin Graft and ReCell™ Autologous Skin Cell Suspension: A Case Report of Two Patients with Large Surface Area Burns

J. R. Cerceo, Aldin Malkoc, Alexandra Nguyen, A. Daoud, David T Wong, Brandon Woodward

Cureus, 2024

5 citations

Abstract

Novel treatments for extensive full-thickness burns revolve around fluid control, addressing systemic inflammatory derangements, and achieving early skin coverage with acceptable cosmetic and functional results. Recent advances in the management of extensive burns include fish skin xenografts, such as Kerecis Omega-3 acellular dermal substitute. Reported to be non-allergenic and antimicrobial, this Atlantic Cod skin derivative has the potential to supplement the management of patients with large surface area burns. A chart review was performed on two complex patients. Patient 1 suffered 65% partial and full-thickness burns after lighting herself on fire with gasoline, and patient 2 suffered 86% partial and full-thickness burns following a methamphetamine explosion. The patients were both treated with a multi-step process using cadaveric allografts, Kerecis acellular fish skin placement, and autologous split-thickness skin grafts (STSG). Case 2 utilized ReCell autologous skin cell suspension and Novosorb bilaminate dermal substitute (BTMTM) due to limited donor sites. Complete coverage and epithelization were achieved on both patients but required multiple reapplications of autograft and Kerecis. Contractures of the neck, elbows, and hand were present in Case 1. Kerecis xenografting may have an expanding role in burn management due to standalone capabilities for deep partial-thickness burns and ease of use. Further evaluation is needed to establish the most optimal timing of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free