Evidence Hub

The Role of Combination Antibiotic Therapy in Combatting Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: A Systematic Review of Randomised Control Trials

Gezmu AA, Tesfaye AW, Coates ARM

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

324 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Acinetobacter baumannii is a major global health threat due to its rapid acquisition of multidrug resistance, particularly to carbapenems. Combination antibiotic therapy has been proposed to enhance antimicrobial activity and suppress resistance; however, evidence from randomized trials remains inconclusive.

Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotic combination therapy versus monotherapy for drug-resistant A. baumannii infections. Searches across MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and Cochrane Central (January 2010-June 2025) identified eligible RCTs reporting clinical outcomes. Data on clinical cure, mortality, microbiological eradication, adverse events, and resistance emergence are described narratively.

Results: Eight RCTs enrolling 324 participants were included. Most trials investigated colistin-based combinations (e.g., colistin plus rifampicin, meropenem, fosfomycin, or sitafloxacin); one assessed tigecycline plus cefoperazone-sulbactam. No regimen demonstrated a significant mortality or clinical cure benefit over monotherapy, despite some combinations showing earlier or higher microbiological clearance, most notably colistin-fosfomycin and colistin-rifampicin, without corresponding improvement in clinical outcomes. Adverse events, predominantly nephrotoxicity, were common but comparable across groups. Heterogeneity in trial size, infection…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 324 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free