Evidence Hub

The Differential Effect of First-Time Single-Point Cane Use between Healthy Young and Older Adults

Omana H, Madou E, Divine A, Wittich W, Hill KD, Johnson AM, Holmes JD, Hunter SW

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Walking aids are often introduced to older adults to enable independent mobility. Single-point canes are the most common device used. Benefits are tempered by research suggesting that walking aids increase fall risk. A better understanding of the effect of walking aid use on gait performance is required.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in the effect of initial single-point cane use on gait between younger (YAs) and older adults (OAs).

DESIGN: Cross-sectional.

SETTING: Community-dwelling.

PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six YAs (mean age ± standard deviation [SD]: 23.7 ± 2.8 years) and 25 OAs (mean age ± SD: 70.8 ± 14.1 years) participated. Inclusion criteria were 18 to 35 years of age for YAs or ≥50 years for OAs, be able to ambulate unassisted, and without any condition affecting mobility.

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gait velocity and stride time variability under different walking path configurations (straight path, Groningen Meander Walking Test, Figure-of-8 Walk Test) and conditions (unassisted walking, walking with a single-point cane, and walking with a single-point cane while completing a cognitive task) were recorded in a laboratory. The arithmetic task of subtracting 1s from 100 was used as the secondary cognitive task. Data analysis included separate three-way mixed analyses of variance (ANOVAs; path/condition/group).

RESULTS: There was a statistically significant two-way interaction between walking path and condition for velocity (P…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free