Evidence Hub

A new screening tool for determining occupational therapy needs in hospitalized children with cancer: a validity and reliability study

Özdemir TE, Baysal Yiğit A, Davutoğlu C, Kutluk MT, Şahin S

European journal of pediatrics, 2026

402 participants

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Determining the occupational therapy needs of hospitalized children with cancer is important. The present study was conducted to evaluate the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of a 25-item checklist developed to quickly and accurately identify occupational therapy needs in pediatric cancer. This cross-sectional methodological study included 402 children with cancer (aged 6-17 years). Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis with the unweighted least squares method based on a tetrachoric correlation matrix. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) and McDonald's Omega (ω) coefficients. Clinical utility and known-groups validity were examined via quartile analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Regarding construct validity, parallel analysis and Scree Plot evaluation confirmed a strong unidimensional structure measuring the general occupational therapy needs construct, replacing the initial multidimensional assumptions. The checklist demonstrated excellent internal consistency (KR-20 = 0.881, ω = 0.888). Known-groups validity analysis revealed significant differences among diagnostic groups (p = 0.005). Post hoc tests indicated that the central nervous system and solid organ tumors group had significantly higher occupational therapy needs compared to the bone and soft tissue tumors group (p = 0.004). Regarding clinical utility, quartile analysis effectively classified patients into low,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 402 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free