Evidence Hub

Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing the Link Between Affective State and Physical Activity in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

C. Ciucurel, M. Ciucurel, L. Georgescu, M. Tudor, Gabriel Olaru, Elena Ioana Iconaru

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

412 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Physical activity (PA) is a key determinant of mental and physical health, yet its relationship with affective states remains insufficiently explored. Emotional factors, such as depression, anxiety, and motivation levels, can significantly impact PA engagement. This study aims to validate the Affective State and Physical Activity Questionnaire (ASPAQ), a novel 15-item instrument designed to assess the interplay between affective states and PA in adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 412 adults (145 males, 267 females, aged 18–65 years). Participants completed the ASPAQ alongside the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) on an online platform, with the support of trained operators. The psychometric properties of the ASPAQ were evaluated using reliability tests (Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and correlational analyses to assess convergent validity. Results: The ASPAQ demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.973; McDonald’s omega = 0.973) and a unidimensional structure. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between ASPAQ scores and established measures of PA (IPAQ-SF) and depression (PHQ-9). EFA confirmed a single-factor model, reinforcing its conceptual integrity. Conclusions: The ASPAQ is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the relationship between affective states…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 412 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free