Evidence Hub

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Relationship Between Dietary Micronutrient Intake, Cognition and Academic Performance Among School-Aged Children in Taabo, Côte d’Ivoire

Achil Tia, A. Konan, Jonas Hauser, Kouassi Y Ndri, Olivier Ciclet, Lasme J. C. E. Esso, Charlemagne Nindjin

Nutrients, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background: Adequate nutrient intake is crucial for cognitive development and academic performance in schoolchildren. This study assessed the association between dietary intake and both cognition and academic performance in school-aged children from Taabo, Côte d’Ivoire. Methods: A total of 252 schoolchildren aged 6–12 years were randomly selected from seven public primary schools. Dietary intake was assessed using repeated 24 h recalls. Cognitive skills were evaluated using Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM) and academic performance was determined based on end-of-year school results. Results: More than half of the participants had adequate intakes of vitamin A (55.8%), vitamin B6 (61.0%), vitamin B12 (61.0%) and omega-3 fatty acids (70.1%), while most had inadequate intakes of iron (96.8%), zinc (100%), thiamin (99.2%), riboflavin (99.6%) and folate (96.8%). Thiamin, riboflavin, folate, iron, zinc and a nutrient blend (comprising iron, zinc, thiamin, riboflavin and folate) showed significant associations with RCPM scores (p < 0.05). Additionally, higher intakes of thiamin (AOR = 6.3; 95% CI: 2.5–16.0, p < 0.001) and riboflavin (AOR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5–7.8, p = 0.003) were associated with increased odds of better cognitive performance compared with lower intakes. No consistent associations were found with academic performance. Conclusions: Compared to recommendations, intakes of several micronutrients were inadequate in most of the children. While thiamin,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free