Evidence Hub

Efficacy of 1.5% levofloxacin otic solution in treating acute otitis externa: A post hoc analysis of ENT103-3001, a multicenter randomized double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled phase III study in otitis media with persistent otorrhea

Matsuda H, Sawada M, Suzuki K, Takahashi H, Ikezono T

Auris, nasus, larynx, 2024

201 participants

Abstract

Objective: In this post hoc analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 1.5% levofloxacin (LVFX) otic solution for the treatment of acute otitis externa (AOE) in patients with nonintact tympanic membrane (NTM) accompanied by chronic suppurative and acute otitis media.

Methods: Digital endoscopic images of the tympanic membrane and cavity were evaluated. In addition, the full analysis set from the original ENT103-3001 study was analyzed to determine the efficacy of the 1.5% LVFX otic solution in treating patients with otitis media with persistent otorrhea. AOE was diagnosed by a study-specific blinded independent review committee (BIRC) in the present study, which reviewed the presence of inflammatory findings, such as edema, erosion, and/or erythema (redness), in the external ear canal on the digital endoscopic images acquired at screening. The improvement in the inflammatory findings in each diseased ear was evaluated by examining the digital endoscopic images acquired at the end of treatment (EOT; including study discontinuation) and follow-up (F/U) visits. Data regarding residual purulent otorrhea at EOT and F/U visits were assessed by the BIRC of the ENT103-3001 study. Similarly, otological symptoms at EOT were recorded in the patients' diaries, and the bacterial eradication rates were used from the ENT103-3001 study. Improvement was defined as the resolution of the inflammatory findings and purulent otorrhea.

Results: Among the 201 patients with otitis media, 161…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 201 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free