Evidence Hub

Dietary and Biological Assessment of Omega-3 Status of Collegiate Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

P. Ritz, M. Rogers, J. Zabinsky, V. Hedrick, J. Rockwell, Ernest Rimer, S. Kostelnik, M. Hulver et al.

bioRxiv, 2020

1,528 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

Omega-3 fatty acids (ω-3 FA) play a number of important functions in health and human performance. While previous research has suggested that low ω-3 FA status is prevalent in the general population, little information about athletes’ ω-3 FA status is available. The purpose of this study was to assess the omega-3 fatty acid (ω-3 FA) status of collegiate athletes. Dietary ω-3 FA intake was evaluated in athletes from nine NCAA Division I institutions (n=1,528, 51% male, 19.9 ± 1.4 years of age, 29 sports represented) via food frequency questionnaire. Omega-3 Index (O3i) was assessed using a dried blood spot sample in a subset of these athletes (n=228). Only 6% (n = 93) of athletes achieved the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics’ recommendation to consume 500 mg of the ω-3 FA’s docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) per day. Use of ω-3 FA supplements was reported by 15% (n = 229) of participants. O3i was 4.33 ± 0.81%, with zero participants meeting the O3i benchmark of 8% associated with the lowest risk of cardiovascular disease. Every additional weekly serving of fish or seafood was associated with an absolute O3i increase of 0.27%. Overall, sub-optimal ω-3 FA status was observed among a large, geographically diverse group of male and female collegiate athletes. These findings may inform interventions aimed at improving ω-3 FA status of collegiate athletes. Further research on athlete-specific ω-3 FA requirements is needed.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,528 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free