Evidence Hub

12-Month Intraocular Pressure and Hypotensive Medications Outcomes After Phaco-ELIOS Procedure-A Real World Study

Moreno-Valladares A, Vinokurtseva A, González-Rodríguez JM, Ahmed IIK, Gonzalez-Aquino E, Puerto-Amorós N, Roquet E, Soldevila A et al.

Journal of glaucoma, 2025

Abstract

PRÉCIS: Combined phaco-ELIOS in ocular hypertension and glaucoma showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of hypotensive medications of 1.5 compared with baseline, with 78.4% of eyes being medication-free at 12 months.

PURPOSE: To describe the change in medication and intraocular pressure 12 months after the combined phacoemulsification-ELIOS procedure.

METHODS: Retrospective, multicenter interventional case series of adults with ocular hypertension or glaucoma undergoing phaco-ELIOS. Clinical data were collected and analyzed from preoperative baseline up to 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the mean change in medication compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes were intraocular pressure change from baseline, incidence of acute postoperative intraocular pressure elevation, and surgical success at 1 year, defined as intraocular pressure reduction of ≥20% compared with baseline with no increase in medications, or reduction of ≥1 medications compared with baseline with intraocular pressure equal or below baseline, with no secondary glaucoma surgeries and no loss of light perception.

RESULTS: One hundred twelve eyes were included. Forty-two patients (51.2%) were female. Mean (±SD) age was 70.6 (±9.6) years. The most frequent diagnosis was primary open angle glaucoma (71.4%). The mean number of medications at baseline and 12 months was 1.8 (±0.8) and 0.4 (±0.7), respectively, representing a reduction of 1.5 (±1.0) ( P <0.0001). At the end of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free