Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance among children in Southeast Asia: a systematic review

Duguid RC, Ashley EA, Turner P, Douangnouvong A, Panyaviseth P, Wijeratne P, Saunders J, Williams PC

BMJ public health, 2025

4,405 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Introduction: There is increasing evidence that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is responsible for a large burden of morbidity and mortality in children, potentially compounded by reduced efficacy of many commonly recommended empirical antibiotic regimens to treat infections in children.

Methods: We used the PRISMA framework to systematically review studies describing AMR in children (0 to 18 years) in Southeast Asia. We analysed bacterial pathogens with a focus on the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) reported in studies published between 2010 and 2023. For each pathogen, non-susceptibility to currently recommended WHO empirical antibiotics was analysed with descriptive statistics.

Results: We evaluated AMR profiles for 21 191 bacterial isolates collated across 111 studies incorporating 484 540 children. Most published data (71 studies) arose from India. High levels of non-susceptibility were evident in gram-negative pathogens, with Klebsiella spp. exhibiting particularly high levels of resistance to gentamicin (median: 64%; IQR 38 to 81, n=2097) and third-generation cephalosporins (median 76%; IQR 40 to 92, n=2415). Furthermore, a median of 73% (IQR 50 to 86, n=4405) of Escherichia coli isolates were non-susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins, and 48% (IQR 32 to 64, n=3659) were non-susceptible to gentamicin. Among gram-positive pathogens, the median methicillin resistance to Staphylococcus aureus was 43% (IQR 33 to 60, n=1139).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,405 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free