Evidence Hub

Characteristics of patients with no underlying toxicologic syndrome evaluated in a toxicology clinic

Leikin JB, Mycyk MB, Bryant S, Cumpston K, Hurwitz S

Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology, 2004

261 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A significant number of patients seek medical evaluation for chronic subjective symptoms they presume to be associated with a single toxic trigger. This report describes our clinic experience with these patients.

CASE SERIES: Twenty patients (of a total of 261 patients) with a mean age of 41 years (median age 42 years; range: 4 to 65 years) were evaluated over an 8 month period. All describe a single past toxic exposure triggering their nonspecific (usually vaguely neurologic) symptoms. Zero of 20 (0%) describe other chemical sensitivities; 2/20 (10%) report ongoing exposure, 18/20 (90%) had a limited exposure dating 1 month to 6 yrs prior to toxicology clinic evaluation; 9/20 (45%) are currently employed; 6/20 (30%) sought alternative medical therapy prior to toxicologist evaluation; 6/20/(30%) have attempted litigation.

CONCLUSION: Despite repeatedly normal toxicologic and medical evaluations, all data refuting an underlying toxic cause are not accepted by this series of patients, and their search for a diagnostic linkage persists. Specific toxin identification or treatment for these patients is unlikely to occur.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 261 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free