Evidence Hub

Freestyle multiple-perforator Island flaps for reconstruction of large dorsolumbar defects: A retrospective case series

Gómez OJ, Balaguera WD, Duque DF, Martínez DC, Rueda LE, Patarroyo LL, Bayona AM, Muñoz SE

JPRAS open, 2026

21 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Keystone-type fasciocutaneous flaps, derived from the angiosome concept, are island flaps that have demonstrated versatility and reliability in the reconstruction of multiple anatomical regions. However, evidence regarding their use in large dorsolumbar soft-tissue defects remains limited. This study describes clinical outcomes and explores flap design parameters, particularly pedicular area proportions, in this challenging anatomical region.

Materials and methods: A retrospective, non-comparative case series was conducted through medical record review of consecutive patients treated between 2021 and 2023. Patients presenting with large soft-tissue defects of the dorsolumbar region who underwent reconstruction using freestyle multiple-perforator island flaps were included. Sociodemographic data, defect characteristics, flap design variables, and postoperative outcomes were extracted and analyzed descriptively.

Results: Twenty-one flaps were performed in 21 patients, with a mean age of 35 years. The mean defect size was 120 cm² (range, 12-353 cm²), and the mean flap size was 283 cm² (range, 27-589 cm²). The mean pedicular area represented 15% of total flap surface. During follow-up, four flaps developed minor wound dehiscence managed conservatively, and one flap presented transient venous congestion. A single case of partial flap loss was observed, with no cases of total flap loss. Notably, flap viability was preserved even in cases with pedicular areas as low…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free