Evidence Hub

Integrating Intact Fish Skin Grafts With Muscle and Fasciocutaneous Flaps to Optimize Wound Coverage and Eliminate Secondary Donor Sites: A Single-surgeon Experience

Baruch E, Anderson J, Endara M

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026

11 participants

Abstract

Background: In complex soft tissue reconstruction, pedicled muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps continue to serve as fundamental techniques. Nevertheless, flap insufficiency, stemming from limited reach, tension, or insufficient bulk, frequently requires secondary flap or grafting procedures, resulting in additional donor site morbidity. This study evaluates the intraoperative application of intact fish skin grafts (IFSGs) as a biological scaffold to assist with wound closure and achieve complete wound coverage without the need for additional donor sites.

Methods: A retrospective case series involving 11 patients who underwent soft tissue reconstruction using muscle (n = 3) or fasciocutaneous (n = 8) flaps integrated with IFSG was conducted by a single plastic surgeon. The application of IFSG was performed intraoperatively when the flap volume or reach proved inadequate. Clinical outcomes, healing timelines, and the necessity for reoperation were systematically evaluated.

Results: Indications for reconstruction included exposed joints, hardware, bone, tendons without paratenon, and aesthetically critical facial defects. All flaps survived, and IFSGs demonstrated full integration. Ten of 11 wounds achieved complete closure without further surgery. The remaining case, complicated by severe lymphedema, achieved flap survival and coverage of the intended exposed bone but did not go on to fully heal. No secondary tissue harvests were required. The mean healing time was 66.6 days.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free