Evidence Hub

Early Amyloid Detection in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Puzzling Gap Between Peripheral and Cardiac Involvement

Martins A, Machado R, Pimenta S, Santos J, Osório H, Madureira P, Serdoura F, Fonseca E et al.

Journal of clinical medicine, 2026

54 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) can be an early manifestation of systemic amyloidosis, particularly transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA). The primary purpose of this retrospective case series was to describe the presence of amyloid deposits in tenosynovial tissue and explore potential cardiac involvement in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release surgery. Methods: From a cohort of 54 patients diagnosed with bilateral idiopathic CTS with surgical indication, 12 patients were selected for tenosynovial tissue samples, which were subsequently evaluated using Congo red staining and proteomic confirmation via mass spectrometry. Before the procedure, patients underwent a clinical assessment of medical history, electrocardiogram, and cardiac scintigraphy with Technetium-99 m 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD). Transthoracic echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance were subsequently performed in all patients with positive scintigraphy, while a subset of scintigraphy-negative patients underwent an echocardiogram. Results: Congo red staining identified amyloid deposits in 3 of the 12 patients (25%). Proteomic analysis confirmed ATTR amyloidosis deposits in 2 of these patients (17%). One of these 2 patients presented Perugini grade 3 uptake on cardiac scintigraphy, suspicious for ATTR-CA. Complete concordance across histology, proteomics, and cardiac imaging was observed in only 1 patient (8.3%). Three discordances were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free