Evidence Hub

Vitamin B12 Supplementation: Is More Always Better?

Yepes-Calderón M, Doorenbos CSE, Stegmann ME, Touw DJ, Harmsen HJM, Heiner-Fokkema MR, van Spronsen FJ, Corpeleijn E et al.

Nutrients, 2026

Abstract

Vitamin B12 supplementation among people without proven deficiency has become popularized, driven by perceptions of (i) frequent underdiagnosis of deficiency, (ii) promotion as a natural enhancer of well-being, and (iii) a favourable safety profile. Here, we examine whether these claims align with current evidence. We present guidance from major health authorities, which advises against routine testing in asymptomatic individuals without risk factors. The prevalence of B12 deficiency varies greatly, mainly because definitions of B12 deficiency are not standardized and may include clinical, biochemical, or functional criteria. Biochemical deficiency (typically serum B12 12-fortified products (up to 69%). Studying the effects of supplementation is also challenged by variation in the regimens used, which range from 0.02 to 1 mg/day orally and from 1 to 5 mg/week intramuscularly, with durations spanning ~4 weeks to ~7 years. This limits cross-study comparability. Overall, supplementation has not shown consistent benefits in populations without overt clinical or biochemical B12 deficiency, with no clear improvements in fatigue, mood, cognition, or cardiovascular outcomes. Benefits, when reported, appear confined to selected subgroups (e.g., hyperhomocysteinemia or low-normal B12 status). B12 supplementation is generally well tolerated. There are rare reports of acneiform and hypersensitivity responses, although these cannot be completely distinguished from reactions to, e.g.,…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free