Evidence Hub

Combined use of respiratory multiplex PCR and procalcitonin to reduce antibiotic exposure in sickle-cell adult patients with acute chest syndrome (The ANTIBIO-STA study): a randomised, controlled, open-label trial

Sabaté-Elabbadi A, Mekontso-Dessap A, Lionnet F, Santin A, Verdet C, Woerther PL, Lopinto J, Turpin M et al.

The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025

37 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background: Respiratory infection may account for 30% of acute chest syndrome (ACS) aetiologies. However, antimicrobials are routinely prescribed, and de-escalation and/or discontinuation are challenging. Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) with an enlarged respiratory panel might support antimicrobial stewardship, and procalcitonin (PCT) measurements help reduce duration of antibiotic therapy. We hypothesized that a strategy combining the use of mPCR with repeated PCT measurements would reduce antibiotic exposure during ACS.

Methods: We conducted a randomised, controlled, parallel group, open-label study in two French hospitals. Consecutive adult patients with ACS were randomly assigned to the conventional or interventional strategy, where antibiotic therapy was targeted on the results of mPCR performed on lower respiratory tract secretions (LRTS) samples, and antibiotic discontinuation based on PCT values and kinetics at Day 1 (D1), D3 and D7. The primary outcome was the number of days of antibiotic exposure at D28 after randomisation. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03919266) and is closed to recruitment.

Findings: From June 2020 to September 2022, 72 patients were assigned to the interventional (n = 37) or conventional strategy (n = 35). Despite a higher rate of microbiological documentation with the intervention (n = 25; 67.6% versus n = 13; 37.1%; difference, 30.4%; 95% CI 6.7%-51.5%), antibiotic exposure at D28 was similar between the two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 37 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free