Use of the Multilayer Fragment Molecular Orbital Method to Predict the Rank Order of Protein–Ligand Binding Affinities: A Case Study Using Tankyrase 2 Inhibitors
Abstract
In computational drug discovery, ranking a series of compound analogues in the order that is consistent with the experimental binding affinities remains a challenge. Many of the computational methods available for evaluating binding affinities have adopted molecular mechanics (MM)-based force fields, although they cannot completely describe protein–ligand interactions. By contrast, quantum mechanics (QM) calculations play an important role in understanding the protein–ligand interactions; however, their huge computational costs hinder their application in drug discovery. In this study, we have evaluated the ability to rank the binding affinities of tankyrase 2 ligands by combining both MM and QM calculations. Our computational approach uses the protein–ligand binding energies obtained from a cost-effective multilayer fragment molecular orbital (MFMO) method combined with the solvation energy obtained from the MM-Poisson–Boltzmann/surface area (MM-PB/SA) method to predict the binding affinity. This approach enabled us to rank tankyrase 2 inhibitor analogues, outperforming several MM-based methods, including rescoring by molecular docking and the MM-PB/SA method alone. Our results show that this computational approach using the MFMO method is a promising tool for predicting the rank order of the binding affinities of inhibitor analogues.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Chaos and quantum thermalization
- The Dalton quantum chemistry program system
- Cord Blood Leptin and Adiponectin as Predictors of Adiposity in Children at 3 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study
- Quantitative metabolomics by H-NMR and LC-MS/MS confirms altered metabolic pathways in diabetes
- Stable adiabatic quantum batteries
- A novel self-lipid antigen targets human T cells against CD1c(+) leukemias
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.