Evidence Hub

Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy for recurrent acute pancreatitis associated with superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a medically complex patient: A case report and literature review

Hirano T, Kogure K, Watanabe Y, Hanada M

Medicine, 2026

Abstract

Rationale: Superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) is a rare cause of duodenal obstruction, and acute pancreatitis associated with SMAS is extremely uncommon. The causal relationship is usually inferred from persistent duodenal obstruction, exclusion of other etiologies, and resolution after decompression.

Patient concerns: A 19-year-old male with a history of esophageal atresia repair, previous upper abdominal surgery, refractory epilepsy, severe developmental delay, and a bedridden status presented with recurrent vomiting and acute pancreatitis. Pancreatitis recurred over a period of 4 years despite repeated conservative management and eventually increased to approximately once per month.

Diagnoses: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed marked gastric and duodenal dilation, compression of the third portion of the duodenum between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery, and a narrowed aortomesenteric angle of 18°. Other causes of pancreatitis, including gallstones, pancreaticobiliary maljunction, and infection, were excluded. Recurrent acute pancreatitis associated with SMAS-related duodenal obstruction was diagnosed.

Interventions: Conservative treatment included bowel rest, nasogastric decompression, intravenous fluid and electrolyte correction, and prokinetic medication. Because recurrent pancreatitis persisted, laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy with omega-loop reconstruction was performed at age 23. Dense intra-abdominal adhesions precluded safe…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free