Evidence Hub

Neutralizing autoantibodies against IFN-α2 and IFN-ω in a boy with a heterozygous variant in the FOXN1 gene

Gutiérrez-Guerrero A, García-Vargas D, Cortés-Acevedo P, Yamazaki-Nakashimada MA, Scheffler-Mendoza SC, Berrón-Ruiz L, Blancas-Galicia L, Barcenas-Morales G et al.

Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) affecting thymic cell development or function can result in thymic aplasia or hypoplasia, autoimmunity, and the generation of neutralizing autoantibodies (Auto-Abs) targeting type I interferons (IFNs) (AAN-I-IFNs). FOXN1 is a master transcriptional regulator of thymic epithelial cells and the impact of the FOXN1 variants spans a spectrum from pathogenic to benign. In pediatric patients with heterozygous FOXN1 variants the full spectrum of clinical and immunological determinants remains to be defined.

Methods: Using a luminex multiplex immunoassay, we assessed the presence of auto-Abs against 14 cytokines. We then employed two complementary in vitro cellular assays to test the neutralizing capacity of circulating auto-Abs against type I IFNs.

Results: Here, we present the case of an 11-year-old child who presented at 20 days of age with multiple severe infections. Genetic analysis revealed a heterozygous FOXN1 variant: c.1448_1451del. The patient tested positive for auto-Abs against type I IFNs. Functional assays confirmed the presence of auto-Abs with neutralizing activity against IFN-α2 (at both low [10 ng/mL] and high [50 ng/mL] concentrations) and against IFN-ω (only at 0.1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL), but not against IFN-β. Five months later, following four doses of rituximab, circulating autoantibodies levels decreased by about 60%.

Conclutions: These findings suggest that heterozygous FOXN1 variants can impair thymic development in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free