Evidence Hub

Successful large caloric deficit with high protein modification diet and intensive aerobic and resistance training with progressive overload in adult patient with significant coronary artery disease: a case report

Laysandro R, Harijanto EA, Sie NA

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: Lifestyle modification plays a central role in obesity and cardiometabolic disease management; however, its application in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is typically cautious due to safety concerns. Caloric restriction with a high protein diet and high-intensity exercise has not been well studied in this setting.

Case presentation: A 43-year-old man with Class III obesity (BMI 43.8 kg/m²), uncontrolled hypertension and severe proximal LAD stenosis (CAD-RADS 4) presented with shortness of breath for evaluation. He declined percutaneous coronary intervention and chose structured intensive lifestyle therapy. Baseline data: waist 125 cm, BP 185/100 mmHg, visceral fat ∼40%, LDL 1.51 mmol/L, HDL 0.97 mmol/L, HbA1c 5.3%, stress METS 6.3 without ischemia.

Management: Under weekly multidisciplinary supervision (internal medicine, cardiology, nutrition, sports medicine), he followed progressive caloric restriction with a high protein diet and high-intensity aerobic plus resistance exercise over 10 months. Usual cardiovascular medical therapy was continued. Monitoring included vitals, ECG, electrolytes, lipids, and exercise tolerance.

Outcome: The patient lost 50 kg (41% of baseline) with BMI 25.8 kg/m², waist 85 cm, visceral fat 12%. Functional capacity improved (METS 6.30-11.5), HDL increased (0.97-1.63 mmol/L), HbA1c decreased (5.3%-4.9%), and blood pressure improved (185/100 to 140/85 mmHg). However, LDL and total cholesterol rose (LDL…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free