Evidence Hub

Beyond the Limits of Human Muscle Hypertrophy: A Case Study of a Mr. Olympia Competitor Bodybuilder

Rosaci G, Biban S, Bartolomei S

Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2026

Abstract

Abstract: Rosaci, G, Biban, S, and Bartolomei, S. Beyond the limits of human muscle hypertrophy: A case study of a Mr. Olympia competitor bodybuilder. J Strength Cond Res 40(10): 1253-1258, 2026-This study aimed to investigate changes in body composition and muscle architecture (muscle thickness [MT] and corrected echo intensity [cEI]) between the bulking and the cutting phase of a professional bodybuilder's preparation (age: 38 years; body mass: 128.7 kg; height: 176 cm). MT and cEI of 9 muscles (elbow flexors, triceps brachii, pectoralis major, upper trapezius, vastus medialis/lateralis, biceps femoris, medial/lateral gastrocnemius) were calculated by B-mode ultrasound images. In addition, training and food logs were analyzed, and body composition was estimated by skinfold measurements at the same timepoints. Caloric intake decreased from ∼5,620 kcal·d -1 in the bulking phase to ∼3,140 kcal·d -1 (-44%) in the cutting phase, while the resistance training program remained largely unchanged. A loss of 6.4 kg was registered in body mass, while a reduction of 0.7 mm only was recorded in the sum of the 3 skinfolds considered. Consistently, all the muscles showed a reduction in MT, particularly evident in the upper trapezius (-28.4%) and in the gastrocnemius medialis (-12.8%). On the contrary, increases in cEI were registered in almost all sites (+28.2% and +30.4% in elbow flexors and biceps femoris, respectively). The increase in cEI registered in the cutting phase, without an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free